| DETECTED PRIMARY STANDARDS - Mandatory Health-Related Standards Established by the State Water Resources Control Board (State Board) |
|||||||||
| CONSTITUENT |
SAMPLE (see #1) | UNITS | PHG or (MCLG) or [MRDLG] | MCL OR [MRDL] | MAJOR SOURCES IN DRINKING WATER | HOOD | EAST WALNUT GROVE | ||
| RANGE (LO-HI) | WEIGHTED AVERAGE | RANGE (LO-HI) | WEIGHTED AVERAGE | ||||||
| INORGANIC CONTAMINANTS | |||||||||
| 2 Arsenic | 2021 - 2024 | PPB | 0.004 | 10 | Erosion of natural deposits; runoff from orchards; glass and electronics production wastes. | ND | ND | ND - 11 | 7.6 |
| Fluoride (Natural Source) | 2024 | PPM | 1 | 2 | Erosion of natural deposits; water additive that promotes strong teeth; discharge from fertilizer and aluminum factories. | ND | ND | 0.16 | 0.2 |
| Barium | 2021 - 2024 | PPM | 2 | 1 | Discharges of oil drilling wastes and from metal refineries; erosion of natural deposits. | 0.38 - 0.40 | 0.39 | ND | ND |
| DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM | |||||||||
| Chlorine Residuals | 2024 | PPM | [4] | [4.0] | Drinking water disinfectant added for treatment. | 0.91 - 1.43 | 1.2 | 0.55 - 1.36 | 1.0 |
| 3 TTHMs [Total Trihalomethanes] | 2024 | PPB | n/a | 80 | Byproduct of drinking water disinfection. | 13 - 28 | 21 | 22 - 54 | 33.3 |
| 4 HAA5 [Sum of 5 Haloacetic Acids] | 2024 | PPB | n/a | 60 | Byproduct of drinking water disinfection. | 2.9 - 6.1 | 4.2 | 7.1 - 13 | 9.1 |
| 5 Fluoride (Treatment - Distribution) | 2024 | PPM | 1 | 2 | Erosion of natural deposits; water additive that promotes strong teeth; discharge from fertilizer and aluminum factories. |
0.63 - 0.89 | 0.74 | 0.63 - 0.94 | 0.80 |
| MICROBIOLOGICAL CONTAMINANTS | LEVEL FOUND | LEVEL FOUND | |||||||
| Total Coliform Bacteria | 2024 | # of Positive Samples |
(0) | >1 | Naturally present in the envirionment. | 0 | 0 | ||
NOTES: 1. The State Water Resources Control Board Division of Drinking Water (SWRCB DDW) allows Sacramento County Water Agency (SCWA) to monitor for some contaminants less than once per year because the concentrations of these contaminants do not change |
|||||||||
| SECONDARY STANDARDS - Aesthetic Standards Established by the State Water Resources Control Board (State Board) |
|||||||||
| CONSTITUENT | SAMPLE DATE: |
UNITS | PHG or (MCLG) or [MRDLG] | MCL or [MRDL] | MAJOR SOURCES IN DRINKING WATER | HOOD | EAST WALNUT GROVE | ||
| RANGE (LO-HI) | WEIGHTED AVERAGE | RANGE (LO-HI) | WEIGHTED AVERAGE | ||||||
| Manganese | 2020 - 2024 | PPB | n/a | 50 | Leaching from natural deposits. | ND | ND | 37 | 37 |
| 6 Odor-Threshold | 2020 - 2024 | Units | n/a | 3 | Naturally-occurring organic materials. | 3 - 8 | 5.3 | 3 - 4.3 | 3.7 |
| Turbidity | 2020 - 2024 | Units | n/a | 5 | Soil runoff. | 0.14 - 0.86 | 0.43 | 0.17 | 0.17 |
| Total Dissolved Solids | 2020 - 2024 | PPM | n/a | 1000 | Runoff/leaching from natural deposits. | 440 - 530 | 475 | 410 - 450 | 430 |
| Specific Conductance (E.C.) | 2020 - 2024 | umhos/cm | n/a | 1600 | Substances that form ions when in water; seawater influence. | 760 - 840 | 805 | 730 - 750 | 740 |
| Chloride | 2020 - 2024 | PPM | n/a | 500 | Runoff/leaching from natural deposits; seawater influence. | 50 - 120 | 87 | 120 | 120 |
| Sulfate | 2020 - 2024 | PPM | n/a | 500 | Runoff/leaching from natural deposits; industrial wastes. | 11 - 22 | 17 | ND | ND |
| OTHER CONSTITUENTS ANALYZED | |||||||||
| pH | 2020 - 2024 | Units | n/a | MO | 8 | 8 | 8.2 | 8.2 | |
| 7 Total Hardness (as CaCO3) | 2020 - 2024 | PPM | n/a | MO | Due to chemicals naturally occuring in the soil below the earth's surface. | 280 | 280 | 44 - 45 | 45 |
| 8 Total Hardness (as CaCO3) | 2020 - 2024 | Grains | n/a | MO | Due to chemicals naturally occuring in the soil below the earth's surface. | 16.4 | 16.4 | 2.59 - 2.63 | 2.6 |
| Total Alkalinity (as CaCO3) | 2020 - 2024 | PPM | n/a | MO | Due to chemicals naturally occuring in the soil below the earth's surface. | 310 | 310 | 190 | 190 |
| Bicarbonate (as HCO3) | 2020 - 2024 | PPM | n/a | MO | Due to chemicals naturally occuring in the soil below the earth's surface. | 260 - 380 | 320 | 190 - 230 | 210 |
| Sodium | 2020 - 2024 | PPM | n/a | MO | Due to chemicals naturally occuring in the soil below the earth's surface. | 48 - 55 | 52 | 130 - 140 | 135 |
| Calcium | 2020 - 2024 | PPM | n/a | MO | Due to chemicals naturally occuring in the soil below the earth's surface. | 59 - 70 | 64 | 11 | 11 |
| Magnesium | 2020 - 2024 | PPM | n/a | MO | Due to chemicals naturally occuring in the soil below the earth's surface. | 31 - 34 | 33 | 4.2 - 4.4 | 4.3 |
| LEAD & COPPER (see #9) | |||||||||
| CONTAMINANT | SAMPLE DATE | UNITS | PHG or MCLG |
ACTION LEVEL | MAJOR SOURCES IN DRINKING WATER | NUMBER OF SAMPLES | 90 % LEVEL DETECTED | NUMBER EXCEEDING AL | |
| HOOD | Lead | 2024 | PPB | (0.2) | 15 | Internal corrosion of household water plumbing systems; discharges from industrial manufactures; erosion of natural deposits. | 10 | ND | 0 |
| Copper | 2024 | PPM | (0.3) | 1.3 | Internal corrosion of household plumbing systems; erosion of natural deposits; leaching from wood preservatives. | 10 | 0.17 | 0 | |
| EWG | Lead (see #10) | 2022 | PPB | (0.2) | 15 | Internal corrosion of household water plumbing systems; discharges from industrial manufactures; erosion of natural deposits. | 7 | 15 | 1 |
| Copper | 2022 | PPM | (0.3) | 1.3 | Internal corrosion of household plumbing systems; erosion of natural deposits; leaching from wood preservatives. | 7 | 0.28 | 0 | |
NOTES: 6. Odor exceeded the threshold of 3 Units when monitoring analysis was done at both the raw water (source wells) and treated water (WT-13) sample sites at the Hood and East Walnut Grove water systems. Odor itselfd oes not represent a human health hazard. Although standards are established for odor in drinking water based on aesthetic criteria, odor can be indicative of water contamination or problems with water treatment, which may have associated health concerns. 7. Hardness units are PPM. General guidelines for classification of water hardness are: 0 - 60 PPM as soft; 61 - 120 PPM as moderately hard; 121 - 180 PPM as hard; and greater than 180 PPM as very hard. 8. Most commercial companies use "grain" units. Conversion: 17.1 PPM = 1 grain. 9. The levels for Lead & Copper concentrations were obtained from the 90th percentile sampling of ten (10) homes at the tap for Hood and seven (7) for EWG. The MCLs for lead and copper are set at "Action Levels" (AL). None of the samples taken in Hood exceeded the Action Level for Copper or Lead. Please refer to the educational information on Lead in drinking water. 10. One EWG sample exceeded and one sample was at the Action Level for lead. Both samples were taken from taps which were unused for more than the 12 hour maximum (according to state and federal guidelines for sampling at the tap). Resamples were taken |
|||||||||
EXCEEDENCE: Every year, we conducted more than 40 test to analyze over 40 contaminants per test. The following contaminants exceeded the primary and secondary standards maximum contaminant level. |
|||||||
| CONTAMINANT | SAMPLE DATE | UNITS | PHG or (MCLG) | MCL OR [MRDL] | HEALTH EFFECTS / SOURCE OF CONTAMINANTS: | RESULT: | LOCATION: |
| Odor | 5/12/2021 | TON | n/a | 3 | Naturally-occurring organic materials. | 4 | Hood On-Site Well (W-25) |
| Odor | 5/12/2021 | TON | n/a | 3 | Naturally-occurring organic materials. | 8 | Hood WTP (WT-13) |
| Odor | 5/6/2024 | TON | n/a | 3 | Naturally-occurring organic materials. | 6 | Hood WTP (WT-13) |
| Odor | 5/7/2020 | TON | n/a | 3 | Naturally-occurring organic materials. | 4.3 | Grove St Well (W-108) |
| Odor | 5/1/2023 | TON | n/a | 3 | Naturally-occurring organic materials. | 3 | Grove St Well (W-108) |
| PER- & POLYFLUOROALKYL SUBSTANCES (PFAS) - See # 11 | |||
| The State Water Resources Control Board Division of Drinking Water (SWRCB DDW) established new drinking water guidelines for water agencies to follow in detecting and reporting the presence of perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA), perfluorooctanesulfonic acid (PFOS), perfluorohexane sulfonic acid (PFHxS), and perfluorobutane sulfonic acid (PFBS) – four members of a large family of chemicals known as per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS). Until PFOA and PFOS were phased out in the 2000s due to health concerns, these chemicals were widely used in grease and stain resistant coatings for consumer products and firefighting foams. Drinking water containing PFAS has become an increasing concern due to the persistence of these chemicals in the environment and their tendency to accumulate in groundwater. Long-term exposure to PFAS over certain levels is associated with adverse health effects that include cancer and developmental harm. SWRCB DDW has identified analytical methods capable of detecting the following twenty-five (25) perfluorinated compounds in drinking water: |
|||
| PERFLUOROBUTANE SULFONIC ACID (PFBS) PERFLUOROHEPTANOIC ACID (PFHpA) PERFLUOROHEXANE SULFONIC ACID (PFHxS) PERFLUORONONANOIC ACID (PFNA) PERFLUOROOCTYL SULFONIC ACID (PFOS) PERFLUOROOCTANOIC ACID (PFOA) |
HEXAFLUOROPROPYLENE OXIDE DIMER ACID (HFPO-DA) PERFLUOROUNDECANOIC ACID (PFUnA) PERFLUORODECANOIC ACID (PFDA) PERFLUORODODECANOIC ACID (PFDoA) PERFLUOROHEXANOIC ACID (PFHxA) 4,8-DIOXA-3H-PERFLUORONONANOIC ACID (ADONA) |
11-CHLOROEICOSAFLUORO-3-OXAUNDECANE-1-SULFONIC ACID (11Cl-PF3OUdS) 1H,1H, 2H, 2H-perfluorodecane sulfonic acid (8:2FTS) 1H,1H, 2H, 2H-perfluorohexane sulfonic acid (4:2FTS) 1H,1H, 2H, 2H-perfluorooctane sulfonic acid (6:2FTS) 9-chlorohexadecafluoro-3-oxanonane-1-sulfonic acid (9Cl- PF3ONS) nonafluoro-3,6-dioxaheptanoic acid (NFDHA) |
perfluoro (2-ethoxyethane) sulfonic acid (PFEESA) perfluoro-3-methoxypropanoic acid (PFMPA) perfluoro-4-methoxybutanoic acid (PFMBA) perfluorobutanoic acid (PFBA) perfluoroheptanesulfonic acid (PFHpS) perfluoropentanesulfonic acid (PFPeS) perfluoropentanoic acid (PFPeA) |
NOTES: 11. In the 2nd Quarter of 2019 and the 4th quarter of 2020, the SWRCB DDW directed SCWA to complete four quarters of sampling in four of our water systems. SCWA tested for PFAS at groundwater wells near locations where the chemicals are believed to be especially prevalent. After completing the required monitoring for PFAS, SCWA began (in 2020) testing for these chemicals at water sources located in the EWG and Hood water systems. The analysis results at EWG and Hood returned Non-Detect. For more information on PFAS, PFOA and PFOS, please visit the SWRCB DDW’s resource page: https://www.waterboards.ca.gov/drinking_water/certlic/drinkingwater/pfas.html |
|||
| PARTS PER MILLION (PPM) OR MILLIGRAMS PER LITER (mg/L) | |||
| Parts per million (PPM) and milligrams per liter (mg/L) are units of measurement to determine the amount of a chemical in water. If we thought of each "part" or "milligram" as a second in a period of time, the following time frames would be an appropriate or accurate comparison: | |||
| 1 milligram per liter (mg/L) | or | 1 part per million (PPM) | =1 second in 11.5 days |
| 1 microgram per liter (μg/L) | or | 1 part per billion (PPB) | =1 second in nearly 32 years |
| 1 nanogram per liter (ng/L) | or | 1 part per trillion (PPT) | =1 second in nearly 32,000 years |
| 1 picogram per liter (pg/L) | or | 1 part per quadrillion (PPQ) | =1 second in nearly 32,000,000 years |
| 100% of the water for the East Walnut grove and Hood community water systems comes from groundwater wells. For more detailed information regarding SCWA water quality, please call Aaron Wyley @ (916) 875-5815. | |||
| LEGEND | ||||
| AL…Regulatory Action Level |
NA…Not Analyzed |
NR…Not Required | PPB…Parts per Billion (ug/l) |
TOC…Total Organic Carbon |
| MFL…Million Fibers Per Liter | n/a…Not Applicable | NTU…Nephelometric Turbidity Units | PPM…Parts per Million (mg/l) | TT…Treatment Technique |
| MO…Monitored Only | ND…Non-Detected | PDWS…Primary Drinking Water Standard | PPT…Parts per Trillion (ng/l) | WTP…Water Treatment Plant |
| MPN…Most Probable Number | NL…Notification Level | pCi/L…Pico Curies per Liter | RL….Response Level |
DEFINITIONS
Average: The annual average of all tests for a particular substance.
Detection Limit for Reporting: The limit at or above which a contaminant is detected.
Maximum Contaminant Level (MCL): The highest level of a contaminant that is allowed in drinking water. Primary MCLs are set as close to the PHGs (or MCLGs) as is economically and technologically feasible.
Secondary MCLs are set to protect the odor, taste, and appearance of drinking water.
Maximum Contaminant Level Goal (MCLG): The level of a contaminant in drinking water below which there is no known or expected risk to health. MCLGs are set by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
Maximum Residual Disinfectant Level (MRDL): The highest level of a disinfectant allowed in drinking water. There is convincing evidence that addition of a disinfectant is necessary for control of microbial contaminants.
Maximum Residual Disinfectant Level Goal (MRDLG): The level of a drinking water disinfectant below which there is no known or expected risk to health. MRDLGs do not reflect the benefits of the use
of disinfectants to control microbial contaminants.
Primary Drinking Water Standards (PDWS): MCLs, MRDLs and treatment techniques (TTs) for contaminants that affect health, along with their monitoring and reporting requirements.
Public Health Goal (PHG): The level of a contaminant in drinking water below which there is no known or expected risk to health. PHGs are set by the California Environmental Protection Agency.
Range (Lo - Hi): The range between the lowest and highest values of a specific substance measured throughout the course of the year.
Regulatory Action Level (AL): The concentration of a contaminant which, if exceeded, triggers treatment or other requirements that a water system must follow.
Treatment Technique (TT): A required process intended to reduce the level of a contaminant in drinking water.
Weighted Average (WTD AVG): An average of water quality samples in which each sample is assigned a weight. Each sample's contribution (or weight) is based on the amount of water the corresponding water source produces
for the whole system. Instead of each of the sample results contributing equally to the final average, some of the results contribute more than others.
STATE MANDATED INFORMATION FOR NITRATE, ARSENIC & LEAD:
Arsenic:
While your drinking water meets the federal and state standard for arsenic, it does contain low levels of arsenic. The arsenic standard balances the current understanding of arsenic's possible health effects against the costs of removing arsenic from drinking water. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency continues to research the health effects of low levels of arsenic, which is a mineral known to cause cancer in humans at high concentrations and is linked to other health effects such as skin damage and circulatory problems.
Lead:
If present, elevated levels of lead can cause serious health problems, especially for pregnant women, infants and young children; as they are typically more vulnerable to lead in drinking water than the general population. Lead in drinking water is primarily from materials and components associated with service lines and home plumbing. The Sacramento County Water Agency is responsible for providing high quality drinking water, but cannot control the variety for materials used in plumbing components. It is possible that lead levels at your home may be higher than at other homes in the community as a result of materials used in your home’s plumbing. If you are concerned about lead in your water, you may wish to have your water tested. When your water has been sitting for several hours, you can minimize the potential for lead exposure by flushing your tap for 30 seconds to 2 minutes before using water for drinking or cooking. If you do so, you may wish to collect the flushed water and reuse it for another beneficial purpose, such as watering plants. Additional information on lead in drinking water, testing methods and steps you can take to minimize exposure is available from the USEPA Safe Drinking Water Hotline (1-800-426-4791) or at http://www.epa.gov/lead.
SOURCE WATER ASSESSMENT
To help protect the quality of existing and future groundwater supplies, the Drinking Water Source Assessment and Protection (DWSAP) program calls for examining the vulnerability of drinking water sources to potential contamination. The Water Agency completed its latest comprehensive report in May 2019. The Water Agency's report identified the following potential contamination results:
Arden Park Vista & Northgate:
Most vulnerable to commercial types of activities such as the dry cleaning business, gas stations, a sewer collection system and a leaking underground storage tank, electronic manufacturers and photo processors.
Central & South Service Area (CSA & SSA):
Most vulnerabe to activities including automobile-gas stations; boat services/ repair/ refinishing; chemical/ petroleum pipelines; dry cleaners; fleet/ truck/ bus terminal; grazing; historic waste dumps/ landfills; leaking underground storage tanks; other animal operations; pesticides/ fertilizer/ petroleum storage transfer areas; plastics/ synthetics producers; research laboratory; wells-agricultural/ irrigation types; wells-oil, gas, and geothermal types; wood preserving/ treating.
Hood, East Walnut Grove and Delta Estates:
Most vulnerable to irrigated crops and septic systems.
North Service Area (NSA):
Most vulnerable to commercial types of activities such as grazing, known contaminant plumes, low-density septic systems, sewer collection systems and wells-agricultural irrigation types.